Pricing Perspective: Formalization Blueprint

3.1 Radii propagate through the embedding

Theorem 23 Inner-product perturbation

For mean embeddings perturbed by at most \(\varepsilon _i\) and \(\varepsilon _j\), the inner product moves by at most \(\varepsilon _i\lVert \mu _j\rVert +\varepsilon _j\lVert \mu _i\rVert +\varepsilon _i\varepsilon _j\).

Proof

Expand the perturbed inner product and bound each cross term.

Theorem 24 Radii add on the metric

Under the same radii, \(\lvert \operatorname {dist}(\mu _i',\mu _j')-\operatorname {dist}(\mu _i,\mu _j)\rvert \le \varepsilon _i+\varepsilon _j\). Additivity on the metric, rather than on the squared quantity, is the same structural fact that makes the metric-level bracket of ??cor:random-w2-metric sharper than its squared counterpart.

Proof

Two applications of the triangle inequality.

Theorem 25 Asymmetric squared bracket

Squaring the metric bracket gives an asymmetric interval, with the lower end truncated at zero. The asymmetry is not cosmetic: it is why the squared-cost formalization cannot simply inherit the metric statement.

Proof

Square both ends of ??thm:dist-bracket and truncate.

Theorem 26 Composed covariance bracket

Under bi-Lipschitz constants stated in the true, unobserved distance and per-asset embedding radii, the covariance inner product is bracketed by polarization expressions evaluated at the radius-inflated and radius-deflated measured distance. The hypothesis that the bi-Lipschitz relation holds in the unobserved distance is the load-bearing one and is not testable from the measured distances.

Proof

Compose ??thm:energy-bracket with the bi-Lipschitz relation and apply polarization at both ends.